Ryzen 7 5800X3D vs Ryzen 9 3900X
Description
The 5800X3D is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 3900X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800X3D gets a score of 631.1 k points while the 3900X gets 756.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900X is 1.2 times faster than the 5800X3D. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800X3D gets a score of 631.1 k points while the 3900X gets 756.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900X is 1.2 times faster than the 5800X3D. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a20f12
870f10
Core
Vermeer
Matisse
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
12/24
TDP
105 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
4x16384 kB
Date
April 2022
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
83.1k points
72.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
631.14k points
756.3k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800X3D
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
22.59k
16.73k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
24.32k
24.74k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.32k
8.82k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.86k
22.22k (x0.89)
TOTAL
83.1k
72.51k (x0.87)
Multithread
5800X3D
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
181.41k
248.24k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
236.12k
309.66k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
105.13k
140.01k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
108.48k
58.39k (x0.54)
TOTAL
631.14k
756.3k (x1.2)
Performance/W
5800X3D
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
1728 points/W
2364 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2249 points/W
2949 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1001 points/W
1333 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1033 points/W
556 points/W
TOTAL
6011 points/W
7203 points/W
Performance/GHz
5800X3D
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
5020 points/GHz
3638 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5405 points/GHz
5377 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2517 points/GHz
1917 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5525 points/GHz
4831 points/GHz
TOTAL
18467 points/GHz
15763 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4