| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5800X3D vs 6800H


Description
The 5800X3D is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 6800H is based on Zen 3+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800X3D gets a score of 631.1 k points while the 6800H gets 478.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800X3D is 1.3 times faster than the 6800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f12
a40f41
Core
Vermeer
Rembrandt
Architecture
Zen 3
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP7
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
105 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2022
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
83.1k points
77.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
631.14k points
478.73k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800X3D
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
22.59k
21.04k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
24.32k
22.41k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.32k
10.21k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.86k
24.27k (x0.98)
TOTAL
83.1k
77.93k (x0.94)

Multithread

5800X3D

6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
181.41k
158.65k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
236.12k
215.86k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
105.13k
89.45k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
108.48k
14.77k (x0.14)
TOTAL
631.14k
478.73k (x0.76)

Performance/W
5800X3D
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
1728 points/W
3526 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2249 points/W
4797 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1001 points/W
1988 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1033 points/W
328 points/W
TOTAL
6011 points/W
10638 points/W

Performance/GHz
5800X3D
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
5020 points/GHz
4477 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5405 points/GHz
4768 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2517 points/GHz
2173 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5525 points/GHz
5163 points/GHz
TOTAL
18467 points/GHz
16581 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4