| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5800X3D vs Ryzen 5 3500X


Description
The 5800X3D is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 3500X is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800X3D gets a score of 631.1 k points while the 3500X gets 373.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800X3D is 1.7 times faster than the 3500X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f12
870f10
Core
Vermeer
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
105 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
32768 kB
Date
April 2022
September 2019
Mean monothread perf.
83.1k points
66.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
631.14k points
373.61k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800X3D
3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
22.59k
15.48k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
24.32k
22.91k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.32k
7.1k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.86k
21.11k (x0.85)
TOTAL
83.1k
66.61k (x0.8)

Multithread

5800X3D

3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
181.41k
90.39k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
236.12k
139.1k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
105.13k
53.2k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
108.48k
90.92k (x0.84)
TOTAL
631.14k
373.61k (x0.59)

Performance/W
5800X3D
3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
1728 points/W
1391 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2249 points/W
2140 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1001 points/W
818 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1033 points/W
1399 points/W
TOTAL
6011 points/W
5748 points/W

Performance/GHz
5800X3D
3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
5020 points/GHz
3776 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5405 points/GHz
5588 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2517 points/GHz
1732 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5525 points/GHz
5149 points/GHz
TOTAL
18467 points/GHz
16246 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4