| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5800X3D vs Core i7-12700


Description
The 5800X3D is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i7-12700 is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800X3D gets a score of 631.1 k points while the i7-12700 gets 698.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-12700 is 1.1 times faster than the 5800X3D. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f12
90672
Core
Vermeer
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
12/20
TDP
105 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32/4x64+8x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x1280+4x2048 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
25600 kB
Date
April 2022
November 2021
Mean monothread perf.
83.1k points
104.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
631.14k points
698.34k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800X3D
i7-12700
Test#1 (Integers)
22.59k
48.39k (x2.14)
Test#2 (FP)
24.32k
26.92k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.32k
13.37k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.86k
15.34k (x0.62)
TOTAL
83.1k
104.01k (x1.25)

Multithread

5800X3D

i7-12700
Test#1 (Integers)
181.41k
415.67k (x2.29)
Test#2 (FP)
236.12k
158.57k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
105.13k
109.37k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
108.48k
14.72k (x0.14)
TOTAL
631.14k
698.34k (x1.11)

Performance/W
5800X3D
i7-12700
Test#1 (Integers)
1728 points/W
6395 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2249 points/W
2440 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1001 points/W
1683 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1033 points/W
226 points/W
TOTAL
6011 points/W
10744 points/W

Performance/GHz
5800X3D
i7-12700
Test#1 (Integers)
5020 points/GHz
9876 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5405 points/GHz
5493 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2517 points/GHz
2728 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5525 points/GHz
3131 points/GHz
TOTAL
18467 points/GHz
21227 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4