Ryzen 7 5800X3D vs Core i5-12500H
Description
The 5800X3D is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-12500H is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800X3D gets a score of 631.1 k points while the i5-12500H gets 225.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800X3D is 2.8 times faster than the i5-12500H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800X3D gets a score of 631.1 k points while the i5-12500H gets 225.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800X3D is 2.8 times faster than the i5-12500H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a20f12
906a3
Core
Vermeer
Alder Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
8/16
12/16
TDP
105 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
18432 kB
Date
April 2022
February 2022
Mean monothread perf.
83.1k points
58.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
631.14k points
225.65k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800X3D
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
22.59k
22.61k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
24.32k
17.73k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.32k
9.63k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.86k
8.4k (x0.34)
TOTAL
83.1k
58.37k (x0.7)
Multithread
5800X3D
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
181.41k
85.49k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
236.12k
94.93k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
105.13k
39.15k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
108.48k
6.08k (x0.06)
TOTAL
631.14k
225.65k (x0.36)
Performance/W
5800X3D
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
1728 points/W
1900 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2249 points/W
2110 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1001 points/W
870 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1033 points/W
135 points/W
TOTAL
6011 points/W
5014 points/W
Performance/GHz
5800X3D
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
5020 points/GHz
5025 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5405 points/GHz
3939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2517 points/GHz
2139 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5525 points/GHz
1867 points/GHz
TOTAL
18467 points/GHz
12971 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4