Ryzen 7 5800X3D vs Core i9-11900KB
Description
The 5800X3D is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i9-11900KB is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800X3D gets a score of 631.1 k points while the i9-11900KB gets 537.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800X3D is 1.2 times faster than the i9-11900KB. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800X3D gets a score of 631.1 k points while the i9-11900KB gets 537.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800X3D is 1.2 times faster than the i9-11900KB. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a20f12
806d1
Core
Vermeer
Tiger Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
105 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
24576 kB
Date
April 2022
July 2021
Mean monothread perf.
83.1k points
63.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
631.14k points
537.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800X3D
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
22.59k
24.09k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
24.32k
19.54k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.32k
8.48k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.86k
11.68k (x0.47)
TOTAL
83.1k
63.79k (x0.77)
Multithread
5800X3D
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
181.41k
220.79k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
236.12k
225.98k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
105.13k
79.1k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
108.48k
11.32k (x0.1)
TOTAL
631.14k
537.18k (x0.85)
Performance/W
5800X3D
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
1728 points/W
3397 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2249 points/W
3477 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1001 points/W
1217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1033 points/W
174 points/W
TOTAL
6011 points/W
8264 points/W
Performance/GHz
5800X3D
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
5020 points/GHz
4917 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5405 points/GHz
3988 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2517 points/GHz
1730 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5525 points/GHz
2384 points/GHz
TOTAL
18467 points/GHz
13018 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4