| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5800X3D vs Core i5-11400


Description
The 5800X3D is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-11400 is based on Rocket Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800X3D gets a score of 631.1 k points while the i5-11400 gets 489.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800X3D is 1.3 times faster than the i5-11400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f12
a0671
Core
Vermeer
Rocket Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
105 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2022
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
83.1k points
86.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
631.14k points
489.31k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800X3D
i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
22.59k
31.23k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
24.32k
25.88k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.32k
10.83k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.86k
18.17k (x0.73)
TOTAL
83.1k
86.11k (x1.04)

Multithread

5800X3D

i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
181.41k
213.85k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
236.12k
195.51k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
105.13k
72.06k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
108.48k
7.89k (x0.07)
TOTAL
631.14k
489.31k (x0.78)

Performance/W
5800X3D
i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
1728 points/W
3290 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2249 points/W
3008 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1001 points/W
1109 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1033 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
6011 points/W
7528 points/W

Performance/GHz
5800X3D
i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
5020 points/GHz
7098 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5405 points/GHz
5881 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2517 points/GHz
2461 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5525 points/GHz
4130 points/GHz
TOTAL
18467 points/GHz
19570 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4