Ryzen 7 5800X vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
Description
The 5800X is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 7940HS is based on Zen 4.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800X gets a score of 558.4 k points while the 7940HS gets 718.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 7940HS is 1.3 times faster than the 5800X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800X gets a score of 558.4 k points while the 7940HS gets 718.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 7940HS is 1.3 times faster than the 5800X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a20f12
a70f41
Core
Vermeer
Phoenix
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP7r2
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
105 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
16384 kB
Date
November 2020
March 2023
Mean monothread perf.
89.53k points
113.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
558.41k points
718.59k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800X
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
24.3k
38.25k (x1.57)
Test#2 (FP)
26.46k
29.92k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.18k
15.5k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.58k
29.89k (x1.12)
TOTAL
89.53k
113.57k (x1.27)
Multithread
5800X
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
187.4k
309.6k (x1.65)
Test#2 (FP)
246.12k
260.4k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.16k
128.56k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.74k
20.04k (x1.71)
TOTAL
558.41k
718.59k (x1.29)
Performance/W
5800X
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
1785 points/W
8846 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2344 points/W
7440 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1078 points/W
3673 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
112 points/W
573 points/W
TOTAL
5318 points/W
20531 points/W
Performance/GHz
5800X
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
5170 points/GHz
7355 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5631 points/GHz
5755 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2592 points/GHz
2981 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5656 points/GHz
5748 points/GHz
TOTAL
19049 points/GHz
21839 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4