Ryzen 7 5800X vs Core i5-12400F
Description
The 5800X is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800X gets a score of 558.4 k points while the i5-12400F gets 512.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800X is 1.1 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800X gets a score of 558.4 k points while the i5-12400F gets 512.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800X is 1.1 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a20f12
90672
Core
Vermeer
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
105 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x1280 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
18432 kB
Date
November 2020
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
89.53k points
88.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
558.41k points
512.23k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800X
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
24.3k
37.79k (x1.56)
Test#2 (FP)
26.46k
24.07k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.18k
12.44k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.58k
13.71k (x0.52)
TOTAL
89.53k
88.01k (x0.98)
Multithread
5800X
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
187.4k
212.6k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
246.12k
197.81k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.16k
84.35k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.74k
17.48k (x1.49)
TOTAL
558.41k
512.23k (x0.92)
Performance/W
5800X
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1785 points/W
3271 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2344 points/W
3043 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1078 points/W
1298 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
112 points/W
269 points/W
TOTAL
5318 points/W
7881 points/W
Performance/GHz
5800X
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5170 points/GHz
8588 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5631 points/GHz
5471 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2592 points/GHz
2827 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5656 points/GHz
3116 points/GHz
TOTAL
19049 points/GHz
20003 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4