Ryzen 7 5800X vs Core i5-9600KF
Description
The 5800X is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-9600KF is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800X gets a score of 558.4 k points while the i5-9600KF gets 371.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800X is 1.5 times faster than the i5-9600KF. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800X gets a score of 558.4 k points while the i5-9600KF gets 371.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800X is 1.5 times faster than the i5-9600KF. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a20f10
906ec
Core
Vermeer
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/6
TDP
105 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
9216 kB
Date
November 2020
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
89.07k points
77.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
558.42k points
371.08k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800X
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
24.14k
30.52k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
26.3k
26.54k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.09k
6.41k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.54k
13.87k (x0.52)
TOTAL
89.07k
77.34k (x0.87)
Multithread
5800X
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
183.54k
174.66k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
237.27k
154.06k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
107.95k
34.11k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.66k
8.24k (x0.28)
TOTAL
558.42k
371.08k (x0.66)
Performance/W
5800X
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
1748 points/W
1839 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2260 points/W
1622 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1028 points/W
359 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
282 points/W
87 points/W
TOTAL
5318 points/W
3906 points/W
Performance/GHz
5800X
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
5137 points/GHz
6635 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5596 points/GHz
5769 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2571 points/GHz
1394 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5646 points/GHz
3015 points/GHz
TOTAL
18951 points/GHz
16813 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4