| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5800X vs Core i9-13900KS


Description
The 5800X is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i9-13900KS is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800X gets a score of 558.4 k points while the i9-13900KS gets 1708.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900KS is 3.1 times faster than the 5800X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f10
b0671
Core
Vermeer
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Zen 3
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
6 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
24/32
TDP
105 W
150 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x2048/4x4096 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
36864 kB
Date
November 2020
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
89.07k points
127.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
558.42k points
1708.56k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800X
i9-13900KS
Test#1 (Integers)
24.14k
57.69k (x2.39)
Test#2 (FP)
26.3k
33.34k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.09k
17.55k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.54k
18.76k (x0.71)
TOTAL
89.07k
127.35k (x1.43)

Multithread

5800X

i9-13900KS
Test#1 (Integers)
183.54k
757.76k (x4.13)
Test#2 (FP)
237.27k
626.83k (x2.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
107.95k
294.93k (x2.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.66k
29.05k (x0.98)
TOTAL
558.42k
1708.56k (x3.06)

Performance/W
5800X
i9-13900KS
Test#1 (Integers)
1748 points/W
5052 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2260 points/W
4179 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1028 points/W
1966 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
282 points/W
194 points/W
TOTAL
5318 points/W
11390 points/W

Performance/GHz
5800X
i9-13900KS
Test#1 (Integers)
5137 points/GHz
9616 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5596 points/GHz
5557 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2571 points/GHz
2925 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5646 points/GHz
3127 points/GHz
TOTAL
18951 points/GHz
21226 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4