| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5800X vs Core i9-13900KF


Description
The 5800X is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i9-13900KF is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800X gets a score of 558.4 k points while the i9-13900KF gets 1660 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900KF is 3 times faster than the 5800X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f10
b0671
Core
Vermeer
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Zen 3
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
5.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
24/32
TDP
105 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x2048/4x4096 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
36864 kB
Date
November 2020
September 2022
Mean monothread perf.
89.07k points
128.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
558.42k points
1660.01k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800X
i9-13900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
24.14k
61.1k (x2.53)
Test#2 (FP)
26.3k
31.23k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.09k
17.57k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.54k
18.89k (x0.71)
TOTAL
89.07k
128.79k (x1.45)

Multithread

5800X

i9-13900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
183.54k
767.22k (x4.18)
Test#2 (FP)
237.27k
576.38k (x2.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
107.95k
284.31k (x2.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.66k
32.09k (x1.08)
TOTAL
558.42k
1660.01k (x2.97)

Performance/W
5800X
i9-13900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
1748 points/W
6138 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2260 points/W
4611 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1028 points/W
2274 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
282 points/W
257 points/W
TOTAL
5318 points/W
13280 points/W

Performance/GHz
5800X
i9-13900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
5137 points/GHz
10535 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5596 points/GHz
5384 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2571 points/GHz
3030 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5646 points/GHz
3257 points/GHz
TOTAL
18951 points/GHz
22206 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4