Ryzen 7 5800U vs Xeon E5-2680 v4
Description
The 5800U is based on Zen 3 architecture while the E5-2680 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800U gets a score of 314.5 k points while the E5-2680 v4 gets 1162.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 3.7 times faster than the 5800U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800U gets a score of 314.5 k points while the E5-2680 v4 gets 1162.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 3.7 times faster than the 5800U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
406f1
Core
Cezanne
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
8/16
14/28
TDP
15 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
14x32+14x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
14x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
35840 kB
Date
January 2021
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
71.16k points
41.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
314.55k points
1162.63k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800U
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
18.34k
17.8k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
22.78k
16.51k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.45k
4.47k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.59k
2.56k (x0.12)
TOTAL
71.16k
41.35k (x0.58)
Multithread
5800U
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
102.74k
494.82k (x4.82)
Test#2 (FP)
143.27k
514.13k (x3.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
58.13k
132.87k (x2.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.41k
20.8k (x2)
TOTAL
314.55k
1162.63k (x3.7)
Performance/W
5800U
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
6849 points/W
4124 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
9551 points/W
4284 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3875 points/W
1107 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
694 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
20970 points/W
9689 points/W
Performance/GHz
5800U
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
4168 points/GHz
5393 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5178 points/GHz
5004 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2147 points/GHz
1355 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4679 points/GHz
777 points/GHz
TOTAL
16172 points/GHz
12529 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4