Ryzen 7 5800U vs Core E5-2620 v3
Description
The 5800U is based on Zen 3 architecture while the E5-2620 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800U gets a score of 314.5 k points while the E5-2620 v3 gets 358 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v3 is 1.1 times faster than the 5800U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800U gets a score of 314.5 k points while the E5-2620 v3 gets 358 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v3 is 1.1 times faster than the 5800U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
306f2
Core
Cezanne
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
15 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
15360 kB
Date
January 2021
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
71.16k points
35.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
314.55k points
357.99k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800U
E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
18.34k
18.64k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
22.78k
10.55k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.45k
4.12k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.59k
2.54k (x0.12)
TOTAL
71.16k
35.86k (x0.5)
Multithread
5800U
E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
102.74k
181.66k (x1.77)
Test#2 (FP)
143.27k
122.09k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
58.13k
47.02k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.41k
7.22k (x0.69)
TOTAL
314.55k
357.99k (x1.14)
Performance/W
5800U
E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
6849 points/W
2137 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
9551 points/W
1436 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3875 points/W
553 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
694 points/W
85 points/W
TOTAL
20970 points/W
4212 points/W
Performance/GHz
5800U
E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
4168 points/GHz
5826 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5178 points/GHz
3297 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2147 points/GHz
1288 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4679 points/GHz
794 points/GHz
TOTAL
16172 points/GHz
11205 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4