Ryzen 7 5800U vs Xeon Bronze 3206R
Description
The 5800U is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 3206R is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800U gets a score of 314.5 k points while the 3206R gets 216 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800U is 1.5 times faster than the 3206R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800U gets a score of 314.5 k points while the 3206R gets 216 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800U is 1.5 times faster than the 3206R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
50657
Core
Cezanne
Cascade Lake-SP
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 3647-0
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/8
TDP
15 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
11264 kB
Date
January 2021
February 2020
Mean monothread perf.
71.16k points
31.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
314.55k points
216.02k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800U
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
18.34k
12.92k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
22.78k
10.97k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.45k
2.54k (x0.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.59k
5.09k (x0.25)
TOTAL
71.16k
31.52k (x0.44)
Multithread
5800U
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
102.74k
103.33k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
143.27k
87.67k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
58.13k
20.1k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.41k
4.91k (x0.47)
TOTAL
314.55k
216.02k (x0.69)
Performance/W
5800U
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
6849 points/W
1216 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
9551 points/W
1031 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3875 points/W
237 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
694 points/W
58 points/W
TOTAL
20970 points/W
2541 points/W
Performance/GHz
5800U
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
4168 points/GHz
6801 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5178 points/GHz
5774 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2147 points/GHz
1334 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4679 points/GHz
2678 points/GHz
TOTAL
16172 points/GHz
16588 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4