Ryzen 7 5800U vs Core i7-10700
Description
The 5800U is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i7-10700 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800U gets a score of 314.5 k points while the i7-10700 gets 537.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10700 is 1.7 times faster than the 5800U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800U gets a score of 314.5 k points while the i7-10700 gets 537.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10700 is 1.7 times faster than the 5800U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
a0655
Core
Cezanne
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16386 kB
Date
January 2021
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
71.16k points
74.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
314.55k points
537.73k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800U
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
18.34k
30.66k (x1.67)
Test#2 (FP)
22.78k
25.64k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.45k
5.98k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.59k
12.25k (x0.6)
TOTAL
71.16k
74.53k (x1.05)
Multithread
5800U
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
102.74k
240.28k (x2.34)
Test#2 (FP)
143.27k
234.3k (x1.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
58.13k
56.12k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.41k
7.02k (x0.67)
TOTAL
314.55k
537.73k (x1.71)
Performance/W
5800U
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
6849 points/W
3697 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
9551 points/W
3605 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3875 points/W
863 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
694 points/W
108 points/W
TOTAL
20970 points/W
8273 points/W
Performance/GHz
5800U
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
4168 points/GHz
6388 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5178 points/GHz
5341 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2147 points/GHz
1245 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4679 points/GHz
2553 points/GHz
TOTAL
16172 points/GHz
15527 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4