| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5800U vs Core i5-9500


Description
The 5800U is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-9500 is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800U gets a score of 314.5 k points while the i5-9500 gets 352.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9500 is 1.1 times faster than the 5800U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
906ea
Core
Cezanne
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/6
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
9216 kB
Date
January 2021
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
71.16k points
73.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
314.55k points
352.84k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800U
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
18.34k
29.17k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
22.78k
25.49k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.45k
5.84k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.59k
13.15k (x0.64)
TOTAL
71.16k
73.65k (x1.04)

Multithread

5800U

i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
102.74k
166.66k (x1.62)
Test#2 (FP)
143.27k
146.9k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
58.13k
34.04k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.41k
5.25k (x0.5)
TOTAL
314.55k
352.84k (x1.12)

Performance/W
5800U
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
6849 points/W
2564 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
9551 points/W
2260 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3875 points/W
524 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
694 points/W
81 points/W
TOTAL
20970 points/W
5428 points/W

Performance/GHz
5800U
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
4168 points/GHz
6629 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5178 points/GHz
5793 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2147 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4679 points/GHz
2990 points/GHz
TOTAL
16172 points/GHz
16739 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4