Ryzen 7 5800U vs Core i5-9400F
Description
The 5800U is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-9400F is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800U gets a score of 314.5 k points while the i5-9400F gets 331.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9400F is 1.1 times faster than the 5800U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800U gets a score of 314.5 k points while the i5-9400F gets 331.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9400F is 1.1 times faster than the 5800U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
906ea
Core
Cezanne
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/6
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
9216 kB
Date
January 2021
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
71.16k points
67.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
314.55k points
331.19k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800U
i5-9400F
Test#1 (Integers)
18.34k
27.15k (x1.48)
Test#2 (FP)
22.78k
23.63k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.45k
5.38k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.59k
11.61k (x0.56)
TOTAL
71.16k
67.77k (x0.95)
Multithread
5800U
i5-9400F
Test#1 (Integers)
102.74k
156.61k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
143.27k
138k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
58.13k
29.45k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.41k
7.14k (x0.69)
TOTAL
314.55k
331.19k (x1.05)
Performance/W
5800U
i5-9400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6849 points/W
2409 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
9551 points/W
2123 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3875 points/W
453 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
694 points/W
110 points/W
TOTAL
20970 points/W
5095 points/W
Performance/GHz
5800U
i5-9400F
Test#1 (Integers)
4168 points/GHz
6622 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5178 points/GHz
5763 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2147 points/GHz
1312 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4679 points/GHz
2831 points/GHz
TOTAL
16172 points/GHz
16528 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4