| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5800U vs Ryzen 9 3900


Description
The 5800U is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 3900 is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800U gets a score of 314.5 k points while the 3900 gets 687.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 3900 is 2.2 times faster than the 5800U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
870f10
Core
Cezanne
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
12/24
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
4x16384 kB
Date
January 2021
September 2019
Mean monothread perf.
71.16k points
74.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
314.55k points
687.5k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800U
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
18.34k
16.85k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
22.78k
26.03k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.45k
9.54k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.59k
22.55k (x1.1)
TOTAL
71.16k
74.97k (x1.05)

Multithread

5800U

3900
Test#1 (Integers)
102.74k
229.41k (x2.23)
Test#2 (FP)
143.27k
292.81k (x2.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
58.13k
128.48k (x2.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.41k
36.8k (x3.54)
TOTAL
314.55k
687.5k (x2.19)

Performance/W
5800U
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
6849 points/W
3529 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
9551 points/W
4505 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3875 points/W
1977 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
694 points/W
566 points/W
TOTAL
20970 points/W
10577 points/W

Performance/GHz
5800U
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
4168 points/GHz
3920 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5178 points/GHz
6054 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2147 points/GHz
2218 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4679 points/GHz
5243 points/GHz
TOTAL
16172 points/GHz
17435 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4