Ryzen 7 5800U vs Ryzen 5 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Description
The 5800U is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800U gets a score of 314.5 k points while the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition gets 327.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is 1 times faster than the 5800U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800U gets a score of 314.5 k points while the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition gets 327.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is 1 times faster than the 5800U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
860f01
Core
Cezanne
Renoir
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
January 2021
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
71.16k points
55.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
314.55k points
327.72k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800U
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
18.34k
15.5k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
22.78k
22.96k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.45k
8.78k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.59k
8.5k (x0.41)
TOTAL
71.16k
55.74k (x0.78)
Multithread
5800U
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
102.74k
110.78k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
143.27k
149.38k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
58.13k
60.88k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.41k
6.68k (x0.64)
TOTAL
314.55k
327.72k (x1.04)
Performance/W
5800U
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
6849 points/W
7386 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
9551 points/W
9959 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3875 points/W
4059 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
694 points/W
445 points/W
TOTAL
20970 points/W
21848 points/W
Performance/GHz
5800U
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
4168 points/GHz
3876 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5178 points/GHz
5739 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2147 points/GHz
2195 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4679 points/GHz
2125 points/GHz
TOTAL
16172 points/GHz
13935 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4