| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5800U vs Ryzen 5 5625U


Description
Both models 5800U and 5625U are based on Zen 3 architecture.

Zen 3 uses TSMC’s 7nm process, still uses the AM4 socket and has up yo 32MB of L3 cache per CCX.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800U gets a score of 314.5 k points while the 5625U gets 281.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800U is 1.1 times faster than the 5625U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
a50f00
Core
Cezanne
Barcelo
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
BGA1140-FP6
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2021
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
71.16k points
70.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
314.55k points
281.26k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800U
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
18.34k
18.57k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
22.78k
22.03k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.45k
9.55k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.59k
20.5k (x1)
TOTAL
71.16k
70.65k (x0.99)

Multithread

5800U

5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
102.74k
92.92k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
143.27k
128.4k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
58.13k
54.82k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.41k
5.13k (x0.49)
TOTAL
314.55k
281.26k (x0.89)

Performance/W
5800U
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
6849 points/W
6194 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
9551 points/W
8560 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3875 points/W
3654 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
694 points/W
342 points/W
TOTAL
20970 points/W
18750 points/W

Performance/GHz
5800U
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
4168 points/GHz
4318 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5178 points/GHz
5124 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2147 points/GHz
2221 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4679 points/GHz
4768 points/GHz
TOTAL
16172 points/GHz
16431 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4