| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5800U vs Core i9-13900K


Description
The 5800U is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i9-13900K is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800U gets a score of 314.5 k points while the i9-13900K gets 1763.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 5.6 times faster than the 5800U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
b0671
Core
Cezanne
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Zen 3
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
5.8 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
24/32
TDP
15 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x2048+4x4096 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
36864 kB
Date
January 2021
October 2022
Mean monothread perf.
71.16k points
129.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
314.55k points
1763.08k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800U
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
18.34k
58.6k (x3.2)
Test#2 (FP)
22.78k
33.29k (x1.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.45k
17.77k (x1.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.59k
19.49k (x0.95)
TOTAL
71.16k
129.15k (x1.82)

Multithread

5800U

i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
102.74k
804.04k (x7.83)
Test#2 (FP)
143.27k
613.45k (x4.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
58.13k
311.08k (x5.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.41k
34.5k (x3.31)
TOTAL
314.55k
1763.08k (x5.61)

Performance/W
5800U
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
6849 points/W
6432 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
9551 points/W
4908 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3875 points/W
2489 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
694 points/W
276 points/W
TOTAL
20970 points/W
14105 points/W

Performance/GHz
5800U
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
4168 points/GHz
10104 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5178 points/GHz
5739 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2147 points/GHz
3064 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4679 points/GHz
3360 points/GHz
TOTAL
16172 points/GHz
22268 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4