Ryzen 7 5800U vs Core i3-13100F
Description
The 5800U is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i3-13100F is based on Raptor Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800U gets a score of 314.5 k points while the i3-13100F gets 390.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-13100F is 1.2 times faster than the 5800U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800U gets a score of 314.5 k points while the i3-13100F gets 390.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-13100F is 1.2 times faster than the 5800U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
b06f5
Core
Cezanne
Raptor Lake-S
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
15 W
58 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2021
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
71.16k points
100.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
314.55k points
390.23k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800U
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
18.34k
47.14k (x2.57)
Test#2 (FP)
22.78k
25.77k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.45k
13.25k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.59k
14.77k (x0.72)
TOTAL
71.16k
100.94k (x1.42)
Multithread
5800U
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
102.74k
168.51k (x1.64)
Test#2 (FP)
143.27k
142.8k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
58.13k
63.57k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.41k
15.34k (x1.47)
TOTAL
314.55k
390.23k (x1.24)
Performance/W
5800U
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
6849 points/W
2905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
9551 points/W
2462 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3875 points/W
1096 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
694 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
20970 points/W
6728 points/W
Performance/GHz
5800U
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
4168 points/GHz
10476 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5178 points/GHz
5728 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2147 points/GHz
2945 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4679 points/GHz
3283 points/GHz
TOTAL
16172 points/GHz
22432 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4