| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5800U vs Core i7-1260P


Description
The 5800U is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i7-1260P is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800U gets a score of 314.5 k points while the i7-1260P gets 391.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1260P is 1.2 times faster than the 5800U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
906a3
Core
Cezanne
Alder Lake-P
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
8/16
12/16
TDP
15 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x1280+8x2048 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
18432 kB
Date
January 2021
February 2022
Mean monothread perf.
71.16k points
94.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
314.55k points
391.07k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800U
i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
18.34k
41.94k (x2.29)
Test#2 (FP)
22.78k
26.81k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.45k
12.63k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.59k
13.51k (x0.66)
TOTAL
71.16k
94.9k (x1.33)

Multithread

5800U

i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
102.74k
168.12k (x1.64)
Test#2 (FP)
143.27k
148.09k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
58.13k
60.28k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.41k
14.58k (x1.4)
TOTAL
314.55k
391.07k (x1.24)

Performance/W
5800U
i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
6849 points/W
6004 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
9551 points/W
5289 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3875 points/W
2153 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
694 points/W
521 points/W
TOTAL
20970 points/W
13967 points/W

Performance/GHz
5800U
i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
4168 points/GHz
8924 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5178 points/GHz
5705 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2147 points/GHz
2687 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4679 points/GHz
2875 points/GHz
TOTAL
16172 points/GHz
20191 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4