Ryzen 7 5800H vs Xeon E5-2697 v2
Description
The 5800H is based on Zen 3 architecture while the E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800H gets a score of 221.2 k points while the E5-2697 v2 gets 419.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 1.9 times faster than the 5800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800H gets a score of 221.2 k points while the E5-2697 v2 gets 419.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 1.9 times faster than the 5800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
306e4
Core
Cezanne
Ivy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
8/16
12 /24
TDP
45 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
30720 kB
Date
February 2021
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
74.56k points
27.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
426.9k points
633.14k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
5800H
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
4.31k
3.44k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
17.51k
9.54k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.53k
4.21k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.57k
3.94k (x0.17)
TOTAL
55.92k
21.13k (x0.38)
Multithread
5800H
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
24.18k
73.17k (x3.03)
Test#2 (FP)
117.98k
230.83k (x1.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
70.96k
107.14k (x1.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.08k
7.99k (x0.99)
TOTAL
221.19k
419.12k (x1.89)
Performance/W
5800H
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
537 points/W
563 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2622 points/W
1776 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1577 points/W
824 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
180 points/W
61 points/W
TOTAL
4915 points/W
3224 points/W
Performance/GHz
5800H
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
980 points/GHz
982 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3979 points/GHz
2726 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2393 points/GHz
1203 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5357 points/GHz
1126 points/GHz
TOTAL
12709 points/GHz
6036 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4