Ryzen 7 5800H vs Xeon E5-1660 v3
Description
The 5800H is based on Zen 3 architecture while the E5-1660 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800H gets a score of 426.9 k points while the E5-1660 v3 gets 353 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800H is 1.2 times faster than the E5-1660 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800H gets a score of 426.9 k points while the E5-1660 v3 gets 353 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800H is 1.2 times faster than the E5-1660 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
306f2
Core
Cezanne
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
20480 kB
Date
February 2021
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
74.56k points
41.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
426.9k points
352.96k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800H
E5-1660 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
20.37k
20.92k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
22.52k
11.87k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.18k
4.67k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.49k
3.85k (x0.18)
TOTAL
74.56k
41.31k (x0.55)
Multithread
5800H
E5-1660 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
144.01k
174.59k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
191.86k
116.47k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.53k
44.79k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.5k
17.1k (x2.63)
TOTAL
426.9k
352.96k (x0.83)
Performance/W
5800H
E5-1660 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3200 points/W
1247 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4264 points/W
832 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1878 points/W
320 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
144 points/W
122 points/W
TOTAL
9487 points/W
2521 points/W
Performance/GHz
5800H
E5-1660 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
4630 points/GHz
5977 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5117 points/GHz
3391 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2314 points/GHz
1333 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4883 points/GHz
1101 points/GHz
TOTAL
16944 points/GHz
11802 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4