| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5800H vs Core i9-9900K


Description
The 5800H is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800H gets a score of 426.9 k points while the i9-9900K gets 529.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 1.2 times faster than the 5800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
906ed
Core
Cezanne
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
February 2021
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
74.56k points
81.91k points
Mean multithread perf.
426.9k points
529.32k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
5800H
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
4.31k
5k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
17.51k
20.22k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.53k
6.54k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.57k
13.78k (x0.58)
TOTAL
55.92k
45.53k (x0.81)

Multithread

5800H

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
24.18k
36.39k (x1.51)
Test#2 (FP)
117.98k
166.55k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
70.96k
54.92k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.08k
8.96k (x1.11)
TOTAL
221.19k
266.82k (x1.21)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800H
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
20.37k
32.08k (x1.58)
Test#2 (FP)
22.52k
28.17k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.18k
6.68k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.49k
14.98k (x0.7)
TOTAL
74.56k
81.91k (x1.1)

Multithread

5800H

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
144.01k
242.98k (x1.69)
Test#2 (FP)
191.86k
220.16k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.53k
53.97k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.5k
12.22k (x1.88)
TOTAL
426.9k
529.32k (x1.24)

Performance/W
5800H
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3200 points/W
2558 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4264 points/W
2317 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1878 points/W
568 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
144 points/W
129 points/W
TOTAL
9487 points/W
5572 points/W

Performance/GHz
5800H
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
4630 points/GHz
6417 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5117 points/GHz
5634 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2314 points/GHz
1335 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4883 points/GHz
2996 points/GHz
TOTAL
16944 points/GHz
16382 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4