| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5800H vs Core i9-10980XE


Description
The 5800H is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800H gets a score of 426.9 k points while the i9-10980XE gets 1241.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 2.9 times faster than the 5800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
50657
Core
Cezanne
Cascade Lake-X
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
8/16
18/36
TDP
45 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
18x32+18x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
18x1024 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
25344 kB
Date
February 2021
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
74.56k points
68.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
426.9k points
1241.12k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
5800H
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
4.31k
4.52k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
17.51k
17.94k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.53k
5.5k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.57k
9.64k (x0.41)
TOTAL
55.92k
37.6k (x0.67)

Multithread

5800H

i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
24.18k
84.93k (x3.51)
Test#2 (FP)
117.98k
409.55k (x3.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
70.96k
122.88k (x1.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.08k
22.12k (x2.74)
TOTAL
221.19k
639.48k (x2.89)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800H
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
20.37k
29.53k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
22.52k
22.59k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.18k
5.99k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.49k
10.22k (x0.48)
TOTAL
74.56k
68.33k (x0.92)

Multithread

5800H

i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
144.01k
587.06k (x4.08)
Test#2 (FP)
191.86k
496.41k (x2.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.53k
134.66k (x1.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.5k
22.99k (x3.54)
TOTAL
426.9k
1241.12k (x2.91)

Performance/W
5800H
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
3200 points/W
3558 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4264 points/W
3009 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1878 points/W
816 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
144 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
9487 points/W
7522 points/W

Performance/GHz
5800H
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
4630 points/GHz
6153 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5117 points/GHz
4707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2314 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4883 points/GHz
2129 points/GHz
TOTAL
16944 points/GHz
14236 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4