| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5800H vs Core i7-9700F


Description
The 5800H is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i7-9700F is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800H gets a score of 221.2 k points while the i7-9700F gets 164.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800H is 1.3 times faster than the i7-9700F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
906ed
Core
Cezanne
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/8
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
February 2021
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
74.56k points
60.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
426.9k points
269.85k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
5800H
i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
4.31k
4.67k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
17.51k
17.16k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.53k
5.7k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.57k
14.37k (x0.61)
TOTAL
55.92k
41.9k (x0.75)

Multithread

5800H

i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
24.18k
26.31k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
117.98k
97.53k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
70.96k
31.53k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.08k
8.94k (x1.11)
TOTAL
221.19k
164.31k (x0.74)

Performance/W
5800H
i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
537 points/W
405 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2622 points/W
1500 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1577 points/W
485 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
180 points/W
138 points/W
TOTAL
4915 points/W
2528 points/W

Performance/GHz
5800H
i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
980 points/GHz
994 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3979 points/GHz
3652 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2393 points/GHz
1212 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5357 points/GHz
3057 points/GHz
TOTAL
12709 points/GHz
8915 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4