| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5800H vs Core i5-9500


Description
The 5800H is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-9500 is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800H gets a score of 426.9 k points while the i5-9500 gets 352.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800H is 1.2 times faster than the i5-9500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
906ea
Core
Cezanne
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/6
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
9216 kB
Date
February 2021
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
74.56k points
73.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
426.9k points
352.84k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
5800H
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
4.31k
4.45k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
17.51k
18.43k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.53k
5.84k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.57k
12.63k (x0.54)
TOTAL
55.92k
41.34k (x0.74)

Multithread

5800H

i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
24.18k
24.75k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
117.98k
103.1k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
70.96k
32.43k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.08k
5.56k (x0.69)
TOTAL
221.19k
165.85k (x0.75)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800H
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
20.37k
29.17k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
22.52k
25.49k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.18k
5.84k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.49k
13.15k (x0.61)
TOTAL
74.56k
73.65k (x0.99)

Multithread

5800H

i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
144.01k
166.66k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
191.86k
146.9k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.53k
34.04k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.5k
5.25k (x0.81)
TOTAL
426.9k
352.84k (x0.83)

Performance/W
5800H
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
3200 points/W
2564 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4264 points/W
2260 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1878 points/W
524 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
144 points/W
81 points/W
TOTAL
9487 points/W
5428 points/W

Performance/GHz
5800H
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
4630 points/GHz
6629 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5117 points/GHz
5793 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2314 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4883 points/GHz
2990 points/GHz
TOTAL
16944 points/GHz
16739 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4