| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5800H vs Core i5-4460


Description
The 5800H is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-4460 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800H gets a score of 426.9 k points while the i5-4460 gets 140.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800H is 3 times faster than the i5-4460. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
306c3
Core
Cezanne
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA1150
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
45 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
6144 kB
Date
February 2021
May 2014
Mean monothread perf.
74.56k points
39.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
426.9k points
140.27k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800H
i5-4460
Test#1 (Integers)
20.37k
19.84k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
22.52k
10.86k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.18k
4.46k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.49k
4.39k (x0.2)
TOTAL
74.56k
39.53k (x0.53)

Multithread

5800H

i5-4460
Test#1 (Integers)
144.01k
75.08k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
191.86k
42.36k (x0.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.53k
16.38k (x0.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.5k
6.45k (x0.99)
TOTAL
426.9k
140.27k (x0.33)

Performance/W
5800H
i5-4460
Test#1 (Integers)
3200 points/W
894 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4264 points/W
504 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1878 points/W
195 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
144 points/W
77 points/W
TOTAL
9487 points/W
1670 points/W

Performance/GHz
5800H
i5-4460
Test#1 (Integers)
4630 points/GHz
5834 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5117 points/GHz
3193 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2314 points/GHz
1311 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4883 points/GHz
1290 points/GHz
TOTAL
16944 points/GHz
11628 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4