| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5800H vs Core i3-9100


Description
The 5800H is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i3-9100 is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800H gets a score of 426.9 k points while the i3-9100 gets 229.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800H is 1.9 times faster than the i3-9100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
906eb
Core
Cezanne
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
6144 kB
Date
February 2021
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
74.56k points
66.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
426.9k points
229.2k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
5800H
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
4.31k
4.3k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
17.51k
17.79k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.53k
5.58k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.57k
8.86k (x0.38)
TOTAL
55.92k
36.53k (x0.65)

Multithread

5800H

i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
24.18k
15.99k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
117.98k
66.31k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
70.96k
20.75k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.08k
4.44k (x0.55)
TOTAL
221.19k
107.49k (x0.49)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800H
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
20.37k
28.03k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
22.52k
24.5k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.18k
5.73k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.49k
8.48k (x0.39)
TOTAL
74.56k
66.74k (x0.9)

Multithread

5800H

i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
144.01k
107.5k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
191.86k
95.11k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.53k
22.02k (x0.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.5k
4.57k (x0.7)
TOTAL
426.9k
229.2k (x0.54)

Performance/W
5800H
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
3200 points/W
1654 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4264 points/W
1463 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1878 points/W
339 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
144 points/W
70 points/W
TOTAL
9487 points/W
3526 points/W

Performance/GHz
5800H
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
4630 points/GHz
6675 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5117 points/GHz
5833 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2314 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4883 points/GHz
2018 points/GHz
TOTAL
16944 points/GHz
15891 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4