| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5800H vs Core i7-11800H (ES)


Description
The 5800H is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800H gets a score of 426.9 k points while the i7-11800H (ES) gets 709.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11800H (ES) is 1.7 times faster than the 5800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
806d0
Core
Cezanne
Tiger Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
24576 kB
Date
February 2021
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
74.56k points
81.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
426.9k points
709.85k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
5800H
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
4.31k
4.4k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
17.51k
20.25k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.53k
11.69k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.57k
11.66k (x0.49)
TOTAL
55.92k
48.01k (x0.86)

Multithread

5800H

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
24.18k
38.93k (x1.61)
Test#2 (FP)
117.98k
191.89k (x1.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
70.96k
108.8k (x1.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.08k
14.95k (x1.85)
TOTAL
221.19k
354.57k (x1.6)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800H
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
20.37k
30.84k (x1.51)
Test#2 (FP)
22.52k
26.38k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.18k
12.66k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.49k
11.74k (x0.55)
TOTAL
74.56k
81.62k (x1.09)

Multithread

5800H

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
144.01k
294.86k (x2.05)
Test#2 (FP)
191.86k
280.92k (x1.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.53k
113.9k (x1.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.5k
20.16k (x3.1)
TOTAL
426.9k
709.85k (x1.66)

Performance/W
5800H
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
3200 points/W
6553 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4264 points/W
6243 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1878 points/W
2531 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
144 points/W
448 points/W
TOTAL
9487 points/W
15774 points/W

Performance/GHz
5800H
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
4630 points/GHz
6705 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5117 points/GHz
5734 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2314 points/GHz
2752 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4883 points/GHz
2552 points/GHz
TOTAL
16944 points/GHz
17744 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4