| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5800H vs 3800XT


Description
The 5800H is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 3800XT is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800H gets a score of 426.9 k points while the 3800XT gets 508.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 3800XT is 1.2 times faster than the 5800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
870f10
Core
Cezanne
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
2x16384 kB
Date
February 2021
July 2020
Mean monothread perf.
74.56k points
78.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
426.9k points
508.89k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800H
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
20.37k
17.57k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
22.52k
27.38k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.18k
9.35k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.49k
23.9k (x1.11)
TOTAL
74.56k
78.2k (x1.05)

Multithread

5800H

3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
144.01k
176.08k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
191.86k
219.88k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.53k
100k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.5k
12.93k (x1.99)
TOTAL
426.9k
508.89k (x1.19)

Performance/W
5800H
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
3200 points/W
1677 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4264 points/W
2094 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1878 points/W
952 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
144 points/W
123 points/W
TOTAL
9487 points/W
4847 points/W

Performance/GHz
5800H
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
4630 points/GHz
3738 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5117 points/GHz
5827 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2314 points/GHz
1989 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4883 points/GHz
5085 points/GHz
TOTAL
16944 points/GHz
16638 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4