| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5800H vs Ryzen 5 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition


Description
The 5800H is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800H gets a score of 426.9 k points while the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition gets 327.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800H is 1.3 times faster than the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
860f01
Core
Cezanne
Renoir
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
February 2021
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
74.56k points
55.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
426.9k points
327.72k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800H
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
20.37k
15.5k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
22.52k
22.96k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.18k
8.78k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.49k
8.5k (x0.4)
TOTAL
74.56k
55.74k (x0.75)

Multithread

5800H

4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
144.01k
110.78k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
191.86k
149.38k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.53k
60.88k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.5k
6.68k (x1.03)
TOTAL
426.9k
327.72k (x0.77)

Performance/W
5800H
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
3200 points/W
7386 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4264 points/W
9959 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1878 points/W
4059 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
144 points/W
445 points/W
TOTAL
9487 points/W
21848 points/W

Performance/GHz
5800H
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
4630 points/GHz
3876 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5117 points/GHz
5739 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2314 points/GHz
2195 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4883 points/GHz
2125 points/GHz
TOTAL
16944 points/GHz
13935 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4