| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5800H vs Ryzen 5 2600X


Description
The 5800H is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 2600X is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800H gets a score of 426.9 k points while the 2600X gets 333.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800H is 1.3 times faster than the 2600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
800f82
Core
Cezanne
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
45 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
February 2021
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
74.56k points
66.44k points
Mean multithread perf.
426.9k points
333.12k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800H
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
20.37k
15.75k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
22.52k
26.29k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.18k
5.91k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.49k
18.48k (x0.86)
TOTAL
74.56k
66.44k (x0.89)

Multithread

5800H

2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
144.01k
94.49k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
191.86k
182.53k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.53k
45.95k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.5k
10.15k (x1.56)
TOTAL
426.9k
333.12k (x0.78)

Performance/W
5800H
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
3200 points/W
995 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4264 points/W
1921 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1878 points/W
484 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
144 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
9487 points/W
3507 points/W

Performance/GHz
5800H
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
4630 points/GHz
3749 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5117 points/GHz
6261 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2314 points/GHz
1408 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4883 points/GHz
4401 points/GHz
TOTAL
16944 points/GHz
15819 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4