| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5800H vs Ryzen 5 2400G


Description
The 5800H is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800H gets a score of 426.9 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800H is 2.2 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
810f10
Core
Cezanne
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
4096 kB
Date
February 2021
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
74.56k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
426.9k points
198.27k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
5800H
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
4.31k
3.8k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
17.51k
17.38k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.53k
5.17k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.57k
3.16k (x0.13)
TOTAL
55.92k
29.52k (x0.53)

Multithread

5800H

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
24.18k
15.28k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
117.98k
76.44k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
70.96k
27.48k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.08k
3.02k (x0.37)
TOTAL
221.19k
122.2k (x0.55)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800H
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
20.37k
14.2k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
22.52k
23.23k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.18k
5.35k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.49k
5.18k (x0.24)
TOTAL
74.56k
47.96k (x0.64)

Multithread

5800H

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
144.01k
58.24k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
191.86k
105.72k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.53k
28.73k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.5k
5.59k (x0.86)
TOTAL
426.9k
198.27k (x0.46)

Performance/W
5800H
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3200 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4264 points/W
1626 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1878 points/W
442 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
144 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
9487 points/W
3050 points/W

Performance/GHz
5800H
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
4630 points/GHz
3641 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5117 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2314 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4883 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
16944 points/GHz
12298 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4