| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5800H vs Core i9-13900K


Description
The 5800H is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i9-13900K is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800H gets a score of 426.9 k points while the i9-13900K gets 1763.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 4.1 times faster than the 5800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
b0671
Core
Cezanne
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Zen 3
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
5.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
24/32
TDP
45 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x2048+4x4096 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
36864 kB
Date
February 2021
October 2022
Mean monothread perf.
74.56k points
129.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
426.9k points
1763.08k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
5800H
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
4.31k
9.77k (x2.27)
Test#2 (FP)
17.51k
24.52k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.53k
17.17k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.57k
21.37k (x0.91)
TOTAL
55.92k
72.83k (x1.3)

Multithread

5800H

i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
24.18k
145.21k (x6.01)
Test#2 (FP)
117.98k
444.95k (x3.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
70.96k
318.3k (x4.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.08k
27.2k (x3.37)
TOTAL
221.19k
935.66k (x4.23)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800H
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
20.37k
58.6k (x2.88)
Test#2 (FP)
22.52k
33.29k (x1.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.18k
17.77k (x1.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.49k
19.49k (x0.91)
TOTAL
74.56k
129.15k (x1.73)

Multithread

5800H

i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
144.01k
804.04k (x5.58)
Test#2 (FP)
191.86k
613.45k (x3.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.53k
311.08k (x3.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.5k
34.5k (x5.31)
TOTAL
426.9k
1763.08k (x4.13)

Performance/W
5800H
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3200 points/W
6432 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4264 points/W
4908 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1878 points/W
2489 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
144 points/W
276 points/W
TOTAL
9487 points/W
14105 points/W

Performance/GHz
5800H
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
4630 points/GHz
10104 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5117 points/GHz
5739 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2314 points/GHz
3064 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4883 points/GHz
3360 points/GHz
TOTAL
16944 points/GHz
22268 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4