| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5700X3D vs Xeon E5-2680 v2


Description
The 5700X3D is based on Zen 3 architecture while the E5-2680 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700X3D gets a score of 537.8 k points while the E5-2680 v2 gets 551.1 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2680 v2 is 1 times faster than the 5700X3D. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f12
306e4
Core
Vermeer
Ivy Bridge-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
8/16
10 /20
TDP
105 W
115 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
25600 kB
Date
April 2022
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
77.6k points
28.23k points
Mean multithread perf.
599.67k points
551.1k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
5700X3D
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
11.96k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
20.49k
10.73k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.63k
4.59k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.78k
4.31k (x0.17)
TOTAL
71.38k
31.6k (x0.44)

Multithread

5700X3D

E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
109.77k
218.24k (x1.99)
Test#2 (FP)
175.93k
206.92k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
103.23k
100.37k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
138.27k
11.45k (x0.08)
TOTAL
527.2k
536.99k (x1.02)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
5700X3D
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
15.53k
10.55k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
22.46k
10.02k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.52k
3.99k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.07k
3.66k (x0.17)
TOTAL
70.57k
28.23k (x0.4)

Multithread

5700X3D

E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
110.52k
215.04k (x1.95)
Test#2 (FP)
208.33k
230.43k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
99.93k
96.87k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
119.03k
8.76k (x0.07)
TOTAL
537.81k
551.1k (x1.02)

Performance/W
5700X3D
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
1053 points/W
1870 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1984 points/W
2004 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
952 points/W
842 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1134 points/W
76 points/W
TOTAL
5122 points/W
4792 points/W

Performance/GHz
5700X3D
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3787 points/GHz
2931 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5478 points/GHz
2784 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2566 points/GHz
1109 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5382 points/GHz
1017 points/GHz
TOTAL
17213 points/GHz
7841 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4