| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5700X3D vs Xeon E5-2670 v3


Description
The 5700X3D is based on Zen 3 architecture while the E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700X3D gets a score of 599.7 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 5700X3D is 1.3 times faster than the E5-2670 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f12
306f2
Core
Vermeer
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
8/16
12/24
TDP
105 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
30720 kB
Date
April 2022
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
77.6k points
36.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
599.67k points
452.9k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
5700X3D
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
3.52k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
17.48k
8.68k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.36k
2.83k (x0.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.35k
3.13k (x0.13)
TOTAL
56.46k
18.17k (x0.32)

Multithread

5700X3D

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
30.78k
32.7k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
150.83k
105.18k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
98.63k
35.18k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
133.24k
9.54k (x0.07)
TOTAL
413.48k
182.59k (x0.44)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
5700X3D
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
11.08k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
20.49k
9.57k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.63k
3.18k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.78k
3.28k (x0.13)
TOTAL
71.38k
27.11k (x0.38)

Multithread

5700X3D

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
109.77k
139.07k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
175.93k
133.47k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
103.23k
46.6k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
138.27k
6.65k (x0.05)
TOTAL
527.2k
325.78k (x0.62)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
5700X3D
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
15.53k
11.18k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
22.46k
10.06k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.52k
3.21k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.07k
3.12k (x0.14)
TOTAL
70.57k
27.57k (x0.39)

Multithread

5700X3D

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
110.52k
140.98k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
208.33k
145.37k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
99.93k
45.62k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
119.03k
6.75k (x0.06)
TOTAL
537.81k
338.73k (x0.63)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700X3D
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
21.08k
18.62k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
23.19k
10.49k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
4.04k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.82k
3.26k (x0.14)
TOTAL
77.6k
36.41k (x0.47)

Multithread

5700X3D

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
167.11k
236.25k (x1.41)
Test#2 (FP)
218.19k
151.05k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100.5k
58.9k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
113.87k
6.7k (x0.06)
TOTAL
599.67k
452.9k (x0.76)

Performance/W
5700X3D
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
1592 points/W
1969 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2078 points/W
1259 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/W
491 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
5711 points/W
3774 points/W

Performance/GHz
5700X3D
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
5140 points/GHz
6006 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5656 points/GHz
3385 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2564 points/GHz
1303 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5567 points/GHz
1052 points/GHz
TOTAL
18926 points/GHz
11745 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4