| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5700X3D vs Core i9-9900KF


Description
The 5700X3D is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i9-9900KF is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700X3D gets a score of 599.7 k points while the i9-9900KF gets 560.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 5700X3D is 1.1 times faster than the i9-9900KF. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f12
906ed
Core
Vermeer
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
105 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
16386 kB
Date
April 2022
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
77.6k points
84.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
599.67k points
560.37k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
5700X3D
i9-9900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
5.1k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
17.48k
18.6k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.36k
6.21k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.35k
15.39k (x0.63)
TOTAL
56.46k
45.3k (x0.8)

Multithread

5700X3D

i9-9900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
30.78k
41.08k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
150.83k
156.9k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
98.63k
56.41k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
133.24k
8.57k (x0.06)
TOTAL
413.48k
262.96k (x0.64)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700X3D
i9-9900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
21.08k
33.03k (x1.57)
Test#2 (FP)
23.19k
29.54k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
6.56k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.82k
15.49k (x0.68)
TOTAL
77.6k
84.62k (x1.09)

Multithread

5700X3D

i9-9900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
167.11k
259.64k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
218.19k
236.58k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100.5k
53.37k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
113.87k
10.78k (x0.09)
TOTAL
599.67k
560.37k (x0.93)

Performance/W
5700X3D
i9-9900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
1592 points/W
2733 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2078 points/W
2490 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/W
562 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/W
113 points/W
TOTAL
5711 points/W
5899 points/W

Performance/GHz
5700X3D
i9-9900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
5140 points/GHz
6606 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5656 points/GHz
5908 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2564 points/GHz
1313 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5567 points/GHz
3099 points/GHz
TOTAL
18926 points/GHz
16925 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4