| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5700X3D vs Core i9-9900K


Description
The 5700X3D is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700X3D gets a score of 599.7 k points while the i9-9900K gets 529.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 5700X3D is 1.1 times faster than the i9-9900K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f12
906ed
Core
Vermeer
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
105 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2022
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
77.6k points
81.91k points
Mean multithread perf.
599.67k points
529.32k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
5700X3D
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
5k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
17.48k
20.22k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.36k
6.54k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.35k
13.78k (x0.57)
TOTAL
56.46k
45.53k (x0.81)

Multithread

5700X3D

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
30.78k
36.39k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
150.83k
166.55k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
98.63k
54.92k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
133.24k
8.96k (x0.07)
TOTAL
413.48k
266.82k (x0.65)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
5700X3D
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
18.03k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
20.49k
25.98k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.63k
6.86k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.78k
14.5k (x0.59)
TOTAL
71.38k
65.37k (x0.92)

Multithread

5700X3D

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
109.77k
131.34k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
175.93k
204.76k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
103.23k
55.74k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
138.27k
8.99k (x0.07)
TOTAL
527.2k
400.83k (x0.76)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
5700X3D
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
15.53k
17.98k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
22.46k
27.04k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.52k
6.63k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.07k
13.6k (x0.62)
TOTAL
70.57k
65.24k (x0.92)

Multithread

5700X3D

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
110.52k
130.88k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
208.33k
208.5k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
99.93k
54.12k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
119.03k
8.91k (x0.07)
TOTAL
537.81k
402.41k (x0.75)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700X3D
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
21.08k
32.08k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
23.19k
28.17k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
6.68k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.82k
14.98k (x0.66)
TOTAL
77.6k
81.91k (x1.06)

Multithread

5700X3D

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
167.11k
242.98k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
218.19k
220.16k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100.5k
53.97k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
113.87k
12.22k (x0.11)
TOTAL
599.67k
529.32k (x0.88)

Performance/W
5700X3D
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
1592 points/W
2558 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2078 points/W
2317 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/W
568 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/W
129 points/W
TOTAL
5711 points/W
5572 points/W

Performance/GHz
5700X3D
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
5140 points/GHz
6417 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5656 points/GHz
5634 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2564 points/GHz
1335 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5567 points/GHz
2996 points/GHz
TOTAL
18926 points/GHz
16382 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4