Ryzen 7 5700X3D vs Core i9-14900K
Description
The 5700X3D is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i9-14900K is based on Raptor Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700X3D gets a score of 599.7 k points while the i9-14900K gets 1756.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-14900K is 2.9 times faster than the 5700X3D. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700X3D gets a score of 599.7 k points while the i9-14900K gets 1756.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-14900K is 2.9 times faster than the 5700X3D. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a20f12
b0671
Core
Vermeer
Raptor Lake-S
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
6 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
24/32
TDP
105 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
36864 kB
Date
April 2022
October 2023
Mean monothread perf.
77.6k points
137.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
599.67k points
1756.59k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700X3D
i9-14900K
Test#1 (Integers)
21.08k
63.55k (x3.02)
Test#2 (FP)
23.19k
32.3k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
18.92k (x1.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.82k
22.61k (x0.99)
TOTAL
77.6k
137.37k (x1.77)
Multithread
5700X3D
i9-14900K
Test#1 (Integers)
167.11k
813.87k (x4.87)
Test#2 (FP)
218.19k
608.32k (x2.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100.5k
313.09k (x3.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
113.87k
21.31k (x0.19)
TOTAL
599.67k
1756.59k (x2.93)
Performance/W
5700X3D
i9-14900K
Test#1 (Integers)
1592 points/W
6511 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2078 points/W
4867 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/W
2505 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/W
170 points/W
TOTAL
5711 points/W
14053 points/W
Performance/GHz
5700X3D
i9-14900K
Test#1 (Integers)
5140 points/GHz
10591 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5656 points/GHz
5383 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2564 points/GHz
3153 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5567 points/GHz
3768 points/GHz
TOTAL
18926 points/GHz
22895 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4