Ryzen 7 5700X3D vs Core i9-10980XE
Description
The 5700X3D is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700X3D gets a score of 599.7 k points while the i9-10980XE gets 1241.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 2.1 times faster than the 5700X3D. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700X3D gets a score of 599.7 k points while the i9-10980XE gets 1241.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 2.1 times faster than the 5700X3D. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a20f12
50657
Core
Vermeer
Cascade Lake-X
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
8/16
18/36
TDP
105 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
18x32+18x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
18x1024 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
25344 kB
Date
April 2022
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
77.6k points
68.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
599.67k points
1241.12k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
5700X3D
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
4.52k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
17.48k
17.94k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.36k
5.5k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.35k
9.64k (x0.4)
TOTAL
56.46k
37.6k (x0.67)
Multithread
5700X3D
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
30.78k
84.93k (x2.76)
Test#2 (FP)
150.83k
409.55k (x2.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
98.63k
122.88k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
133.24k
22.12k (x0.17)
TOTAL
413.48k
639.48k (x1.55)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
5700X3D
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
16.03k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
20.49k
23.95k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.63k
6.03k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.78k
9.37k (x0.38)
TOTAL
71.38k
55.38k (x0.78)
Multithread
5700X3D
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
109.77k
316.11k (x2.88)
Test#2 (FP)
175.93k
503.75k (x2.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
103.23k
131.82k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
138.27k
22.24k (x0.16)
TOTAL
527.2k
973.92k (x1.85)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
5700X3D
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
15.53k
16.4k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
22.46k
20.97k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.52k
5.82k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.07k
8.86k (x0.4)
TOTAL
70.57k
52.05k (x0.74)
Multithread
5700X3D
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
110.52k
316.84k (x2.87)
Test#2 (FP)
208.33k
461.09k (x2.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
99.93k
129.82k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
119.03k
22.09k (x0.19)
TOTAL
537.81k
929.85k (x1.73)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700X3D
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
21.08k
29.53k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
23.19k
22.59k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
5.99k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.82k
10.22k (x0.45)
TOTAL
77.6k
68.33k (x0.88)
Multithread
5700X3D
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
167.11k
587.06k (x3.51)
Test#2 (FP)
218.19k
496.41k (x2.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100.5k
134.66k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
113.87k
22.99k (x0.2)
TOTAL
599.67k
1241.12k (x2.07)
Performance/W
5700X3D
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
1592 points/W
3558 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2078 points/W
3009 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/W
816 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
5711 points/W
7522 points/W
Performance/GHz
5700X3D
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
5140 points/GHz
6153 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5656 points/GHz
4707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2564 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5567 points/GHz
2129 points/GHz
TOTAL
18926 points/GHz
14236 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4