| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5700X3D vs Core i9-10900K


Description
The 5700X3D is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i9-10900K is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700X3D gets a score of 599.7 k points while the i9-10900K gets 685.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10900K is 1.1 times faster than the 5700X3D. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f12
a0655
Core
Vermeer
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
10/20
TDP
105 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
20480 kB
Date
April 2022
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
77.6k points
80.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
599.67k points
685.65k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
5700X3D
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
19.5k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
20.49k
28.01k (x1.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.63k
7.45k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.78k
15.82k (x0.64)
TOTAL
71.38k
70.79k (x0.99)

Multithread

5700X3D

i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
109.77k
194.49k (x1.77)
Test#2 (FP)
175.93k
312.59k (x1.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
103.23k
89.14k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
138.27k
12.58k (x0.09)
TOTAL
527.2k
608.81k (x1.15)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700X3D
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
21.08k
32.67k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
23.19k
28.49k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
6.53k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.82k
12.72k (x0.56)
TOTAL
77.6k
80.41k (x1.04)

Multithread

5700X3D

i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
167.11k
307.39k (x1.84)
Test#2 (FP)
218.19k
298.47k (x1.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100.5k
72.94k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
113.87k
6.85k (x0.06)
TOTAL
599.67k
685.65k (x1.14)

Performance/W
5700X3D
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
1592 points/W
2459 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2078 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/W
583 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
5711 points/W
5485 points/W

Performance/GHz
5700X3D
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
5140 points/GHz
6282 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5656 points/GHz
5479 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2564 points/GHz
1257 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5567 points/GHz
2445 points/GHz
TOTAL
18926 points/GHz
15463 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4