| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5700X3D vs Core i7-9700K


Description
The 5700X3D is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i7-9700K is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700X3D gets a score of 599.7 k points while the i7-9700K gets 494.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 5700X3D is 1.2 times faster than the i7-9700K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f12
906ed
Core
Vermeer
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/8
TDP
105 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2022
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
77.6k points
81.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
599.67k points
494.38k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
5700X3D
i7-9700K
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
4.97k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
17.48k
17.98k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.36k
5.89k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.35k
14.49k (x0.59)
TOTAL
56.46k
43.32k (x0.77)

Multithread

5700X3D

i7-9700K
Test#1 (Integers)
30.78k
37.81k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
150.83k
138.05k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
98.63k
41.78k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
133.24k
7.13k (x0.05)
TOTAL
413.48k
224.77k (x0.54)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
5700X3D
i7-9700K
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
17.94k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
20.49k
25.66k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.63k
6.46k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.78k
14.52k (x0.59)
TOTAL
71.38k
64.58k (x0.9)

Multithread

5700X3D

i7-9700K
Test#1 (Integers)
109.77k
136.23k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
175.93k
191.58k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
103.23k
44.51k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
138.27k
7.25k (x0.05)
TOTAL
527.2k
379.56k (x0.72)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
5700X3D
i7-9700K
Test#1 (Integers)
15.53k
17.43k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
22.46k
26.9k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.52k
6.24k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.07k
14.12k (x0.64)
TOTAL
70.57k
64.69k (x0.92)

Multithread

5700X3D

i7-9700K
Test#1 (Integers)
110.52k
134.6k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
208.33k
191.15k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
99.93k
42.84k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
119.03k
7.25k (x0.06)
TOTAL
537.81k
375.84k (x0.7)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700X3D
i7-9700K
Test#1 (Integers)
21.08k
32.45k (x1.54)
Test#2 (FP)
23.19k
28.3k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
6.27k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.82k
14.93k (x0.65)
TOTAL
77.6k
81.96k (x1.06)

Multithread

5700X3D

i7-9700K
Test#1 (Integers)
167.11k
244.31k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
218.19k
199.72k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100.5k
43.15k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
113.87k
7.2k (x0.06)
TOTAL
599.67k
494.38k (x0.82)

Performance/W
5700X3D
i7-9700K
Test#1 (Integers)
1592 points/W
2572 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2078 points/W
2102 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/W
454 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/W
76 points/W
TOTAL
5711 points/W
5204 points/W

Performance/GHz
5700X3D
i7-9700K
Test#1 (Integers)
5140 points/GHz
6623 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5656 points/GHz
5776 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2564 points/GHz
1281 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5567 points/GHz
3047 points/GHz
TOTAL
18926 points/GHz
16726 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4