| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5700X3D vs Core i7-1065G7


Description
The 5700X3D is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i7-1065G7 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700X3D gets a score of 599.7 k points while the i7-1065G7 gets 214.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 5700X3D is 2.8 times faster than the i7-1065G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f12
706e5
Core
Vermeer
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
105 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2022
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
77.6k points
74.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
599.67k points
214.34k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700X3D
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
21.08k
28.19k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
23.19k
22.13k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
10.32k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.82k
14.17k (x0.62)
TOTAL
77.6k
74.82k (x0.96)

Multithread

5700X3D

i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
167.11k
86.39k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
218.19k
86.22k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100.5k
32.99k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
113.87k
8.75k (x0.08)
TOTAL
599.67k
214.34k (x0.36)

Performance/W
5700X3D
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
1592 points/W
5759 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2078 points/W
5748 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/W
2199 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/W
583 points/W
TOTAL
5711 points/W
14289 points/W

Performance/GHz
5700X3D
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
5140 points/GHz
7229 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5656 points/GHz
5675 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2564 points/GHz
2646 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5567 points/GHz
3634 points/GHz
TOTAL
18926 points/GHz
19184 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4