| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5700X3D vs Core i5-9600KF


Description
The 5700X3D is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-9600KF is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700X3D gets a score of 599.7 k points while the i5-9600KF gets 371.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 5700X3D is 1.6 times faster than the i5-9600KF. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f12
906ec
Core
Vermeer
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/6
TDP
105 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
9216 kB
Date
April 2022
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
77.6k points
77.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
599.67k points
371.08k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
5700X3D
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
4.63k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
17.48k
19.43k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.36k
6.17k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.35k
13.82k (x0.57)
TOTAL
56.46k
44.04k (x0.78)

Multithread

5700X3D

i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
30.78k
26.64k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
150.83k
110.11k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
98.63k
33.07k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
133.24k
8.3k (x0.06)
TOTAL
413.48k
178.11k (x0.43)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
5700X3D
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
16.5k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
20.49k
24.35k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.63k
6.54k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.78k
13.59k (x0.55)
TOTAL
71.38k
60.98k (x0.85)

Multithread

5700X3D

i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
109.77k
93.78k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
175.93k
134.47k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
103.23k
32.24k (x0.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
138.27k
8.22k (x0.06)
TOTAL
527.2k
268.71k (x0.51)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
5700X3D
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
15.53k
16.92k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
22.46k
25.44k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.52k
6.36k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.07k
13.25k (x0.6)
TOTAL
70.57k
61.97k (x0.88)

Multithread

5700X3D

i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
110.52k
95.51k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
208.33k
143.19k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
99.93k
33.85k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
119.03k
8.21k (x0.07)
TOTAL
537.81k
280.77k (x0.52)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700X3D
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
21.08k
30.52k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
23.19k
26.54k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
6.41k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.82k
13.87k (x0.61)
TOTAL
77.6k
77.34k (x1)

Multithread

5700X3D

i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
167.11k
174.66k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
218.19k
154.06k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100.5k
34.11k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
113.87k
8.24k (x0.07)
TOTAL
599.67k
371.08k (x0.62)

Performance/W
5700X3D
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
1592 points/W
1839 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2078 points/W
1622 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/W
359 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/W
87 points/W
TOTAL
5711 points/W
3906 points/W

Performance/GHz
5700X3D
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
5140 points/GHz
6635 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5656 points/GHz
5769 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2564 points/GHz
1394 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5567 points/GHz
3015 points/GHz
TOTAL
18926 points/GHz
16813 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4