| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5700X3D vs Core i5-8265U


Description
The 5700X3D is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700X3D gets a score of 599.7 k points while the i5-8265U gets 143.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 5700X3D is 4.2 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f12
806ec
Core
Vermeer
Whiskey Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1528
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
105 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2022
August 2018
Mean monothread perf.
77.6k points
46.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
599.67k points
143.23k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
5700X3D
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
3.68k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
17.48k
16.08k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.36k
4.99k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.35k
7.95k (x0.33)
TOTAL
56.46k
32.69k (x0.58)

Multithread

5700X3D

i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
30.78k
14.29k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
150.83k
61.15k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
98.63k
16.53k (x0.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
133.24k
3.72k (x0.03)
TOTAL
413.48k
95.69k (x0.23)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
5700X3D
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
13.6k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
20.49k
20.03k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.63k
5.19k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.78k
7.05k (x0.28)
TOTAL
71.38k
45.87k (x0.64)

Multithread

5700X3D

i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
109.77k
51.42k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
175.93k
77.48k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
103.23k
16.65k (x0.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
138.27k
3.69k (x0.03)
TOTAL
527.2k
149.24k (x0.28)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
5700X3D
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.53k
13.66k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
22.46k
21.17k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.52k
5k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.07k
8.11k (x0.37)
TOTAL
70.57k
47.94k (x0.68)

Multithread

5700X3D

i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
110.52k
51.36k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
208.33k
79.72k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
99.93k
16.61k (x0.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
119.03k
3.75k (x0.03)
TOTAL
537.81k
151.44k (x0.28)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700X3D
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
21.08k
19.19k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
23.19k
17.47k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
4.04k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.82k
5.97k (x0.26)
TOTAL
77.6k
46.67k (x0.6)

Multithread

5700X3D

i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
167.11k
64.43k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
218.19k
61.91k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100.5k
13.36k (x0.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
113.87k
3.52k (x0.03)
TOTAL
599.67k
143.23k (x0.24)

Performance/W
5700X3D
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
1592 points/W
4296 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2078 points/W
4128 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/W
890 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/W
235 points/W
TOTAL
5711 points/W
9548 points/W

Performance/GHz
5700X3D
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
5140 points/GHz
4920 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5656 points/GHz
4478 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2564 points/GHz
1037 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5567 points/GHz
1531 points/GHz
TOTAL
18926 points/GHz
11966 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4