| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5700X3D vs Core i5-10500


Description
The 5700X3D is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-10500 is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700X3D gets a score of 599.7 k points while the i5-10500 gets 388 k points.

Summarizing, the 5700X3D is 1.5 times faster than the i5-10500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f12
a0653
Core
Vermeer
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
105 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2022
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
77.6k points
75.27k points
Mean multithread perf.
599.67k points
387.99k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
5700X3D
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
4.52k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
17.48k
18.52k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.36k
5.58k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.35k
14.2k (x0.58)
TOTAL
56.46k
42.82k (x0.76)

Multithread

5700X3D

i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
30.78k
25.26k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
150.83k
120.48k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
98.63k
38.12k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
133.24k
7.68k (x0.06)
TOTAL
413.48k
191.54k (x0.46)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
5700X3D
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
16.3k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
20.49k
23.22k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.63k
6.22k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.78k
14.05k (x0.57)
TOTAL
71.38k
59.79k (x0.84)

Multithread

5700X3D

i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
109.77k
92.61k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
175.93k
147.68k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
103.23k
40.71k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
138.27k
7.78k (x0.06)
TOTAL
527.2k
288.77k (x0.55)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
5700X3D
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
15.53k
16.33k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
22.46k
24.73k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.52k
5.99k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.07k
13.64k (x0.62)
TOTAL
70.57k
60.69k (x0.86)

Multithread

5700X3D

i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
110.52k
91.64k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
208.33k
158.71k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
99.93k
39.84k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
119.03k
7.76k (x0.07)
TOTAL
537.81k
297.94k (x0.55)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700X3D
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
21.08k
28.73k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
23.19k
26.01k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
6.08k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.82k
14.46k (x0.63)
TOTAL
77.6k
75.27k (x0.97)

Multithread

5700X3D

i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
167.11k
172.66k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
218.19k
167.57k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100.5k
39.45k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
113.87k
8.31k (x0.07)
TOTAL
599.67k
387.99k (x0.65)

Performance/W
5700X3D
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
1592 points/W
2656 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2078 points/W
2578 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/W
607 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/W
128 points/W
TOTAL
5711 points/W
5969 points/W

Performance/GHz
5700X3D
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
5140 points/GHz
6384 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5656 points/GHz
5780 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2564 points/GHz
1351 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5567 points/GHz
3212 points/GHz
TOTAL
18926 points/GHz
16727 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4